Our work

Financing reparations

Reparations are affordable.

Despite their clear obligation under international law, States are often reluctant to enact administrative reparation programmes. A key reason for their inaction is that reparations are often perceived as unaffordable. This is false.

Survivors of conflict-related sexual violence have a right to reparation for the harms they have suffered, there is a legal and moral imperative to find ways to finance the fulfilment of this right. There are diverse forms of financing available for reparation programmes.

Mixing both traditional and innovative methods is necessary to yield the results for sufficient and sustainable funds. Investing in these programmes provides justice and healing for survivors, along with positive long-term economic impact and increased stability. Policymakers must identify, allocate, and blend financing pathways to develop realistic and long-term reparation programmes that are accessible to all survivors.

Our financing dossiers

Sanctions on perpetrators of international crimes and violations committed in Syria and their affiliates are robust. From the US to France, governments around the world have seized, frozen and confiscated assets of Assad regime officials and ISIS members. Now States enacting sanctions regimes can take the next step to using this money for victims of gross human rights violations. We are advocating for the creation of an International Fund for Syrian Victims, where States can pool together resources for financing reparation for victims located around the world, including survivors of detention.

Many countries stopped the international flow of money for Russian officials after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. There are positive developments in the use of frozen funds for supporting Ukraine. While reconstruction and security are important priorities, the Global Survivors Fund and partners are arguing that reparation must also be top of the list. In collaboration with REDRESS, we are following the funds frozen in the United Kingdom related to the sale of Chelsea Football Club, amounting to some £2.5 billion.
Following the coup in Myanmar in 2021, many countries have moved to enact sanctions regimes on generals in the military junta. Funds have been frozen, but discussions around their use is minimal. We want to overcome the lack of strategic international interest in Myanmar, by engaging with Asian civil society on advocating for the use of frozen funds for reparation.
International financial institutions such as the World Bank Group and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development have a role to play in this space. They have supervised the disbursement of recovered funds in the past, but their involvement could be so much more. We are advocating that International Financial Institutions consider reparation as a priority in engaging client countries undergoing periods of fragility, conflict, violence, or transitional justice.

There is a misconception that reparations owed to survivors of conflict-related sexual violence and other gross violations of human rights are not affordable and we need to dispel that myth.

A selection of briefings